The Reality of Jerusalem

One of the most eye-opening lessons of having been a divorce attorney for close to 15 years was the realization that most, if not all, clients know the truth of their relationship even if they choose not to believe it. This means that whatever the reason turned out to be for the failed marriage, the underlying truth of the deficiency was known but ignored. Sometimes the reason “for looking the other way” was financial; sometimes it was because it was easier to stay the course than brave the unknown…but an awareness of the underlying truth was none-the-less present. It made me acutely aware of our propensity to see only what we want to see and only what supports our current belief system.

This propensity isn’t limited to our personal relationships. It’s starkly evident in our politics. You either hate Donald Trump, seeing everything he does as evil, or you love him, believing he can do no harm. Yet, truth is not so clearly defined.

Donald Trump is human and, therefore, flawed. This means that he sometimes makes good decisions and sometime bad ones. It means he can be emotionally arrested at, perhaps, some adolescent stage of development while at the same time being intellectually competent and able to strategize with a high degree of success. There is no incompatibility in the co-existence of such facts even if the combination of them if less than ideal. He is who he is.

I try and make my evaluations of the President’s behavior not within the context of the “love him or hate him model” but rather upon the wisdom, or lack thereof, of each individual action. This allows me to sometimes stand with him and sometimes stand in opposition to him.

This brings me to where I stand on his decision regarding Jerusalem.

As I stated at the outset of this post, we humans have a hard time with reality when it flies in the face of what we prefer to believe. So, the wife who denies that her husband is having an affair, even when all the evidence points to the contrary, has much in common with the person who denies Jerusalem is the capital of Israel, even when all the evidence points to the contrary.

The evidence was factually and succinctly set forth in President Trump’s announcement of the U.S. recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel:

It was 70 years ago that the United States, under President Truman, recognized the State of Israel. Ever since then, Israel has made its capital in the city of Jerusalem — the capital the Jewish people established in ancient times. Today, Jerusalem is the seat of the modern Israeli government. It is the home of the Israeli parliament, the Knesset, as well as the Israeli Supreme Court. It is the location of the official residence of the Prime Minister and the President. It is the headquarters of many government ministries.  For decades, visiting American presidents, secretaries of state, and military leaders have met their Israeli counterparts in Jerusalem, as I did on my trip to Israel earlier this year.

Facts are pesky things to those who deny their existence. But denial of fact does little to diminish its existence.

As an American Jew, you might think I have a dog in this hunt and maybe I do. But as a lawyer, I can tell you that many a juror has a vested interest in some aspect of a case they may be seated in deciding. But we ask such jurors if “despite your feelings or experience, do you think you can hear the facts of this particular case and make a fair and impartial decision based upon the facts?” When the answer is “yes” we seat that juror.

Having an interest does not necessarily translate into having a bias.

In the instance of Jerusalem I cannot comprehend why any American, especially Jewish Americans, cannot put their political lens aside and simply examine the facts as set forth by the President in his decision-making process. The capital of Israel is Jerusalem whether you are a Democrat or Republican…unless, of course, you are first-and-foremost a single issue, political creature rather than a human who discerns and accepts facts, distinguishing them from agenda or wishful thinking.

My way of analyzing President Trump is a balanced approach which allows me to see the totality of the man while at the same time distinguishing between his weaknesses and his strengths. It allows me to be repulsed by the way he has referred to women or demeaned his opponents; yet, it also allows me to take great comfort and pride in his courage to speak truth to power and stand for what is right by recognizing Jerusalem as the legitimate capital of Israel.

Carole

(contact@carolegold.com)

Bitcoin and The Banks

Over the last few weeks Jamie Dimon, Chief Executive of J.P. Morgan, has been leading the charge against bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.  Given that J.P Morgan had revenues of over 90 billion dollars last year, it at first seemed odd to me that Dimon would be so vocal in his opposition. Yet he has repeatedly gone out of his way over the past few months to trash bitcoin, even going so far as saying it should be banned. Dimon is no fool. He knows bitcoin has the potential to upend the banking industry. This is precisely why he is trying to kill it before it gets even close.

Banks work as a depository of information. In order to open an account, you have to go to a bank and give them the requisite information. Once that’s done, the bank is able to track all of the transactions that you conduct. For example, when I buy gas at Shell Oil, Shell’s computer system talks to JP Morgan’s computer system and verifies my information. It, Morgan, verifies that I have sufficient funds in my account to approve the transaction in question.

Governments like banks because of this central ledger system. It allows government as well to go to one “location” to track all of an individual’s transactions. So, if the I.R.S. wants to freeze my accounts and garnish my wages, all they have to do is go to the bank and direct the bank to do so.  The courts love it as well because in bankruptcy cases and civil judgements  there is an easy mechanism for freezing and seizing assets.

Enter bitcoin and its not so easy. Allow me to explain.

The underlying software behind bitcoin is called “block chain technology” which is a radical breakthrough in software technology. Information is spread out and stored in various locations.  To conduct a trade in bitcoin requires the use of a “distributive ledger” as opposed to banks which operate with one central ledger. Obtaining information via bitcoin requires accessing multiple distributive ledgers.

Picture a wall full of books with a single book at the center of the wall. All of the other books around it support each other and are linked to each other. If I were to remove that one book, every other book around it would be impacted and would have to agree to the move. It is the same way with bitcoin. When I pay someone in bitcoin, a signal gets sent out to all of these ledgers that have to agree that I actually own this bitcoin. Once verified, I am able to “send” this bitcoin to where the transaction is verified and another “block” is built…which is verified by all of the other ledgers.

An additional benefit of bitcoin is that the individual’s  identity is masked. There are no name associated with the amount of bitcoin you own. If someone were to look at a bitcoin transaction, all they would be able to see is “xys456 paid 26xgjky.” Without names, neither you nor anyone else can determine who owns these bitcoins.

Given 1) anonymity and  2) a distributive ledger bitcoin ownership has exploded. The fact is bitcoin and the block chain technology are going to move ahead with or without approval of the U.S. government with the banking industry exposed to  the potential of being left behind. Think internet in the 1990’s: banning it would have been pointless and not getting on board would have made you the equivalent of a technological dinosaur.

What most people don’t realize is that the U.S. has the most to lose with the advent of bitcoin because we have, by far, the deepest and strongest capital markets which force people to use the U.S. dollar. In addition, all commodity transactions are priced in dollars with the most important one being oil.  Given the enormity of these markets, there is always a demand for dollars as well as government bonds. Our economy literally “sucks in” dollars from all over the world and our power is based on the fact that we are the reserve currency of the world.

Because there is such a demand for U.S. dollars we have the ability, through banking sanctions, to cut off countries from those dollars. Those central ledgers that banks control have allowed the U.S. to act as the global policeman. Look at Cuba. It was shut off from the global economy with debilitating result.

Bitcoin, cryptocurrencies and block chain technology have the ability to upend the global banking system and U.S. dominance of it. This is why Jamie Dimon is bashing bitcoin.  Its worth noting that Goldman Sachs, one of J.P. Morgan’s biggest competitors, has seen the light of this new technology and now employs more people in its technology department than Linkedin or Twitter.

Block-Chain technology will change and impact our lives  in ways not yet imagined. Bitcoin offers an economy outside and irrespective of the U.S. dollar. It ends U.S. dominance of the world economy. This is the banking sectors greatest fear…and the terror of those who have disproportionately profited from that system.

Steve

sleeclark@gmail.com

Drowning in Content

There is a famous story in Hollywood about a young director who approached a seasoned Hollywood producer for advice on how to complete a movie he was working on. The producer said, “Live for ten years and then do the movie.”

Most young people have no stories to tell. They have no context to shape stories and no depth to give them life. How could they? They haven’t lived long enough. Are there exceptions? Sure.  Wendy Shalit, who wrote her seminal book “A Return to Modesty” about sexuality, is impressive given that she was in her early twenties when she wrote the book. Or, Ryan Holliday who, at age 20, wrote his expose on the media in, Trust me I’m Lying. Its insight into the tricks used by the media to manipulates the public. However, Shalit and Holliday are the exceptions not the rule.

Generally speaking, lasting creativity require years of living and introspection to mature. Steve Martin’s autobiography “Born Standing Up” provides great insight into the journey of a comic and how Martin became a master of his craft. He spent years living in motel rooms while doing stand-up routines all over the country. He reworked and refined his jokes while performing in thousands of venues before he finally made it. When the public finally heard of Steve Martin, they called him an “overnight sensation” after appearing on Saturday Night Live. What they did not see were all the years of dedication, trial and error to hone his craft.

Most great work and analysis takes time. Yet, given the advent of the web, there is an increased demand for content the likes of which we have never before seen. Newspapers, blogs, media sites must produce insightful and relevant content for eyeballs, clicks and advertising dollars. I suspect that the administrators of these sites are overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content they need to come up with on a daily basis. Combine this with an educational system that focuses more on political correctness than facts… and you have a recipe for disaster. An insatiable  demand for content, a Left leaning educational system and a lack of general history is the baseline for the content we see.

The pressure and rush to create content sublimates the need for truthfulness and accuracy. It does irreparable damage and is making us a less civil society.  Check out these three reports that got it wrong:

Story 1

A  few years ago, CNN reporter Erin Burnett did a huge story on the Catholic Church’s opposition to gay marriage and the resultant decrease in church attendance as a result. Burnett’s position was that people like her would never join the church, and its former members would never return to the church, unless it became more modern and adapted to the prevailing culture. I guess in CNN’s mind it was a valid viewpoint and worth the resources to develop.

But Catholics with any religious foundation understood the juvenile approach to Burnett’s perspective. The Church does not endorse gay marriage because it believes marriage is a sacrament where a man and woman are joined in matrimony for the creation of life. It’s that simple. The Church has taught this for over 2000 years and continues to do so. Erin Burnett thought she had hit upon what reforms the Church needed to enact to become more relevant. Instead, what she displayed was a total lack of understanding of the Catholic Church. The Church does not care about change. It cares about teaching the Word of God. For the Church, the truth is not determined by polls or popular opinion, it is self-evident and found in Scripture.

Story 2

The last eight years was filled with reporting on the “do-nothing” Congress under former President Obama. The story was highlighted every day, ad nauseam, how handicapped Obama was due to Congress’ obstructionism. The obstruction got so bad that Obama’s only real piece of legislation, Obamacare, was passed only when he had control over both houses. Even then, the bill was never reconciled in the Senate.

To those who prefer to forget, Scott Brown was elected Senator from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts solely for his promise to cast the one vote that would stop reconciliation of the bill. But Brown was never given the chance. Obama passed the bill by circumventing the legislative process.

The actual reason President Obama was barely able to pass any bills is because that was how the system was created over two hundred years ago. It had nothing to do with President. The Founding Fathers so mistrusted the political class, and career politicians, that they designed a system that gave all of its power to the people…not the politicians. Anyone with a basic understanding of civics knows this. However, the media did not report it as a systemic fail safe because they wanted Congress to capitulate its role and give in to Obama whose political agenda synced with theirs. For eight years, the media tried to convince the American public that Congress was at fault. To the contrary, under our  Constitution, the Executive branch simply failed to bring along the Legislative branch for consensus.

Story 3

We have seen the complete removal of the Confederate Flag from our national history. Southern war heroes, as well as Confederate solders graves, have been desecrated. The media has a narrative, lacking in subtly, that the Civil War was fought by the North against the South over slavery. Southerners were racist, had slaves and wanted to keep that way of life intact. Northerners were noble, pure and thought the cause was important enough to fight the South to abolish it.

The Civil War occurred between 1861-1865. Slaves in the North were not freed until 1863, or two years after the war had started. If the North thought it was so important, why didn’t they free their slaves prior to the war? The fact is that although slavery was a major issue,  it wasn’t the only issue that drove the Civil War. The South wanted to secede from the North over taxation and other states’ rights issues, including slavery, and the North was not going to let that happen. The Civil War was a manifestation of the ongoing debate over states’ rights versus a centralized government. That debate, which began in the 1700’s, rages on today. The issues affecting the Civil War are complex; but, the false narrative promulgated by the media pushes the narrative of a racist South while never shining a light on the culpability of the North.

Our youth are most vulnerable and easily manipulated because they lack the necessary perspective and critical thinking skills that come from an understanding of history tempered with one’s own life experiences.  When Al Gore tells young people, “There are some things about our world that you know that older people don’t know,” Why would that be? Well in a period of rapid change, the old assumptions sometimes just don’t work anymore because they’re out of date,”  is no different than handing democracy to a nation that has spent hundreds of years or more under dictatorship. You need a period of transition and perspective. Without those, a little bit of knowledge can be a dangerous thing.

Such is the damage done by a media driving people to civil unrest through revisionist history and misinformation. We are more connected than at any other time in human history. It is ironic that content for its own sake lacking truthfulness and integrity is doing as much harm, if not more, than when we knew less.

Steve

sleeclark@gmail.com

Should Mnuchin Resign?

 

Yesterday I received the following message from someone at my high school:

“To my fellow Riverdale Country School alumni. I am inspired by Yale alumni asking Mnuchin to resign in protest of President Trump’s support of Nazism and White Supremacy. I believe many of Mnuchin’s fellow Riverdale alumni feel the same. I’m collecting feedback from this post. Looking to see if there is interest–or if anyone has any great ideas on how to get a message through.”

Steve Mnuchin went to my high school and is the current Secretary of the Treasury appointed by President Trump. He also went to Yale and his University is asking him to resign. Now, alumni of our high school are asking him to do the same as a sign of protest over Trump’s comments and lack of response to the Charlottesville violence.

I wanted to post the following on my friend’s timeline: “I must have missed Trumps quote , can you please provide the quote that Trump supported the Nazis and white supremacist groups.” But, before I did, I was stopped by an old friend. He is a very outspoken black conservative radio host in Atlanta. He told me, “Steve, the real crazies are the ones we grew up with back home in NYC (Northeast Liberals). Even I wouldn’t ask that right now. The Left is totally unhinged.”

The argument over Trump’s statements are not that he did not condemn the protestors; but, that he did not do it forcefully enough. Therefore, he must be a racist.

During the same period, ESPN pulled an Asian announcer from one of their  football broadcasts because his name is Robert Lee.  Apparently, ESPN is worried that some people may confuse Robert Lee the football announcer with Robert E. Lee, the Confederate General who has been dead for over 100 years. This is insane. But, it won’t stop. Even NYC Mayor de Blasio has said he may pull down a statue of Christopher Columbus because of his dubious past. Columbus Circle, where the statue stands, is the epicenter of New York City. It stands at the cross roads of Central Park and is at the intersection between the East and West sides of New York.

ESPN, De-Blasio, and others are merely following the same path that the pitchfork mob has set. There is no logic and no reason driving their behavior and it won’t stop until we collectively all stop.

The Left and Progressives are getting on the band wagon to remove our history. The first thing that being assaulted is free speech. The reason I did not comment on the post was because all of the people on that thread would have targeted and called me a Nazi sympathizer for asking a simple question: “Please show me the text of Trump’s comments supporting the Nazi’s and White Supremacists.” The Left marches on….erroneously claiming the high ground while tearing down a public forum for civil debate.

This is not the first time I have experienced this type of silencing.

A few years back I had a similar experience when I  was invited to comment on a friend’s “entertainment lawyer’s” blog regarding the stance of the Catholic Church on contraception. (I was invited because of my understanding on Catholic doctrine so as to foster a robust debate.) What I wrote on that blog was only two sentences long explaining church teachings. Yet, within minutes, I had hundreds of comments and direct messages calling me the most vile names for those two sentences. I literally had to block numerous agitators who would send me threatening messages for weeks on end, all for stating the church’s teachings. The Left did not want to hear the rationale. What they wanted was  to silence and intimidate me.

This whole movement is an exercise in power. Power by the Left to control society.  While free speech may be first, they have larger goals in mind. The destruction and annihilation of our history followed by a new society unconstrained by our Constitution. In a relatively short period of time, the Left has been able to remove the confederate flag, southern iconic statutes and now the desecration of confederate soldiers’ graves.

This is only the beginning.

The Left does not seem to understand that, in the end, all revolutionaries eventually eat their own. There is never anybody remaining who is pure enough. It is a standard no man can meet. Look at what happened to the leaders of the French Revolution. They were killed by same the movement they started.  So what started out as removal of confederate generals’ statues could end up with the removal of the Washington Memorial and worse.

If you are a new reader to this blog you know I work in conjunction with Carole Gold. On the face of it, the Left would immediately label us as two white people who write this blog and thus our opinions don’t count. Yet, Carole is female and Jewish. I am Latino and Catholic with an immigrant mother. By all traditional definitions we are part of that special cabal called “minorities.” Yet in the Leftist world, our opinions have no value since we are “white.”

Pamela Geller, the Conservative activist,  has warned her readers for years about the cultural march by the Left. Geller has warned that our silence in these matters only emboldens the Left. She believes we are in a culture war on the verge of a civil war and that those on the Right will no longer be able to remain silent. In the future we will no longer have that option. We will have to choose sides. So I write this blog and post my articles on Medium so as not to remain silent.

In the end, I opted not to post on my friend’s feed, because the truth of the advice I was given hit home: the Left has become totally and absolutely unhinged. They have lost the ability to reason. They would not have been able to read my comments as thoughtful and provoking but rather as an attempt by another “white nationalist” defending Trump.

The Left has gone insane but marches on. God help us all. Yet as I write that last sentence I know that we must stand for what we believe in and help ourselves or there will be no Divine assistance. God is back-up for the correct use of our Free Will to stand and be heard for what is in the highest good for all humankind and not be intimidated by the violence of a few.

Steve

sleeclark@gmail.com

 

 

Long Live The Memory of the Confederacy

There is a reason Auschwitz stands. There is a reason Jews and non-Jews visit the site. There is a reason no one leaves it untouched, shaken and forever changed. Auschwitz stands as a historical reminder of man’s inhumanity to humankind. To have leveled it would have been to erase history and lose the opportunity to learn from human error.

This is why destroying Confederate monuments, or any U.S. history, are very bad ideas. The monuments are not the problem but rather the false history we have been taught regarding what they represent.

We each know, in our own lives, that when we feel shame about behavior once participated in…well, it’s the best way to assure we won’t do it again. It is no different with our national life.

We need to let those monuments stand as testimony to the inhuman political and social perspective that they represent. The Civil War wasn’t about States’ Rights. That is simply a lie. To teach that it was is to perpetuate the lie. The Civil War was about the Confederacy’s attempt to mandate slavery not only in the then Confederate states but in any future state that would join the Confederacy. And it was an attempt to institutionalize slavery in perpetuity. If you doubt this, read the Confederate Constitution; but, at the least read these two excerpts:

Article IV Section 2(1)

“The citizens of each State shall be entitled to all the privileges and immunities of citizens in the several States; and shall have the right of transit and sojourn in any State of this Confederacy, with their slaves and other property; and the right of property in said slaves shall not be thereby impaired.” 

Article IV Section 3(3)

The Confederate States may acquire new territory; and Congress shall have power to legislate and provide governments for the inhabitants of all territory belonging to the Confederate States, lying without the limits of the several states; and may permit them, at such times, and in such manner as it may by law provide, to form states to be admitted into the Confederacy. In all such territory, the institution of negro slavery as it now exists in the Confederate States, shall be recognized and protected by Congress, and by the territorial government: and the inhabitants of the several Confederate States and Territories, shall have the right to take to such territory any slaves lawfully held by them in any of the states or territories of the Confederate states. 

As with President Trump’s statement that at the Charlottesville protests there was wrongdoing on both sides, let’s teach the truth about our history regarding both sides.

President Woodrow Wilson, the first Progressive, has perhaps more elementary and middle schools named after him nationally than any other President, including the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University. Wilson was an indisputable racist who segregated the U.S. Army a half century after the Civil War. Economist Bruce Bartlett writes the following:

“Similarly, when U. S. forces entered the “war to end all wars,” President Wilson may have wanted to “make the world safe for democracy” but as commander-in-chief he did so with a segregated military. World War I brought no improvement in Wilson’s policy towards blacks. They were put in segregated military units, mostly relegated to support positions, and kept out of combat.”

As for President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, consistently named as one of the top three most revered U.S. Presidents, his response to Nazi Germany was to ignore the documented atrocities of the Germans until he was forced to enter World War II. Further, Roosevelt’s response to that war was to establish his own camps here in the U.S. to round up and imprison innocent German and Asian U.S. citizens.

It isn’t history that is our enemy but false history.

How do such things happen? Well, prior to Barack Obama, Wilson was the last academic elected to the Presidency and so academia honors its own. A member of the tribe had to be portrayed as a hero not the despicable person that he was. Progressives have reigned supreme over academia ever since, at all levels of education. Hence, revisionist history as a fact of American life.

Let us teach the truth about our history. The good and the bad. There is a plethora of both. Let us glory in our good deeds and allow ourselves to fully feel the shame of those that were…well…shameful.

As a Jew, I want Auschwitz to stand. As an American, I want statues to the Confederacy to stand as well. But above all, I want the truth taught..the good, the bad and the ugly.  For it is by recalling and teaching the truth that we are liberated and uplifted, not by symbolic acts of tearing down memorials that represent revisionist history or, worse, deny it altogether.    Carole

 

A Fidget Spinner Without a Plan

If you are a parent you certainly know what a fidget spinner is. They are everywhere. A year ago no one had even heard of them. Yet, walk into any gas station and you’ll find them displayed right out in front. What happened? People started buying and companies started supplying without any guidance or plan. Money was to be made! This is the beauty of the free market. It perceives what people want and then others move in to supply that demand.

So why, in any problem related to the public good, do politicians and the media clamor for “a plan?”  Why do they go endlessly in search of a plan that will fix infrastructure, public education, healthcare or whatever needs correction? Why does there always have to be a plan? Why don’t we deal with issues the same way the market dealt with fidget spinners?

Healthcare has been contentious for years. Admittedly, a certain segment of the population was uninsured or un-insurable (albeit it a small one proportionally speaking ). So, the politicians decided to come out with a plan to fix it. The Affordable Care Act (so misnamed!!!…also dubbed “Obamacare”) was forced upon us all so that every person in the U.S. could get insurance. So how come even with a law and a plan, there are still millions without insurance?

One of the key parts of the Obamacare plan was to insure people who had pre-existing conditions. Previously, one of the biggest criticisms about insurance is that if you had cancer no insurance company would cover you. The often unpalatable reality is that this is exactly how insurance works. Insurance is defined as “A practice or arrangement by which a company or government agency provides a guarantee of compensation for specified loss, damage, illness, or death in return for payment of a premium.” If you already have the loss (i.e. cancer) it is not an insurable item. This is no different than someone getting into a car accident then attempting to buy auto collision insurance after the fact then demanding damages and/or loss payment from the insurer!

The sales pitch was that with the Obamacare plan, even those with a pre-existing conditions would be covered. However, this is not insurance. Its a subsidy. Someone else must provide the funds to pay for a subsidy which is, essentially, a give-away. Those burdened with that obligation, it turns out, are people who get sick the least and have the least amount of money…the young.

(Lest anyone think I am hard-hearted, such an approach can include provisions for that relatively small number of persons truly destitute or who have pre-existing conditions.  Its simply a scare tactic and red herring to say that if you are opposed to government run healthcare you want to see the poor, sick and elderly die. In fact, if you’re opposed to greedy, lying politicians making personal life decisions for you and others, you’re probably more rational, informed and compassionate than not).

The young, to whom I refer,  are finally beginning to understand their economic predicament as it relates to Obamacare. The  have begun to revolt. Yet, last week,  Congress n its infinite wisdom, refused to repeal Obamacare. Naturally, Obama along with many other Democrats, was elated. Most of the media critiques went like this: “The Republicans hate Obamacare but they have no plan of their own.”

The success of Obamacare rests on the young but they don’t like paying for things they don’t use. Look at the cable business which relies on bundled services. Cable subscriptions are in serious decline because the younger generation hates paying for one hundred channels when they only watch six. They don’t understand why they are paying to watch M.T.V and the History Channel, for example, when they only watch H.B.O. They get it. They only wanto pay for things they use. Well,  Obamacare, like cable TV,  is premised on the notion of bundled services. If they are already unwilling to pay $30.00 a month for HGTV, what makes the proponents of Obamacare think they will pay for healthcare services for people they do not know and services from which they receive no benefit?

The members of the mainstream media are also big proponents of getting the government involved to fix the issue and selling the plan to the public.

Sixty Minutes entire show format revolves around investigating  problems that society can’t solve and then asking why nothing has been done to fix them.  John Stossel, the libertarian pundit on Fox started off as a Left-leaning journalist reporting on the evils of big business just as Sixty Minutes still does. He would do reports on how these entities had failed the public at large and needed to be reined in. Plans and government regulations needed to be expanded to fix whatever the issue was. But as time went on, Stossel realized that he was the one causing the most damage. He came to the conclusion that over time free markets correct and provide the needed product or service at the best price. No amount of reporting he did ever solved the problem.

Perhaps the real fault in government plans is that those elected to Congress who devise them have rarely ever run a business or successfully worked in the private sector. They are novices, at best, and ill-equipped to deal with the realities and practicalities of what it takes to supply goods and services.  The premise that government needs to supply “plans” to fix the problem is a false premise that always results in loss of individual rights and freedoms.

In the real world, individuals faced with a problem in their lives needing a solution tends to figure it out for themselves. No group meetings, no theory, no pilfering of someone else’s financial resources to solve their problem.

Markets aren’t perfect. But history verifies that nothing distributes scarce resources more fairly and efficiently than free markets. We already have government run healthcare at the Department of Veterans Affairs Hospitals and it has failed miserably. Let’s put patients in tandem with their treating physicians in control of healthcare and let freedom work.

 

Steve

sleeclark@gmail.com

 

Obama’s Redistribution Of Wealth

Want to know how Wall Street and the select few got rich and keep getting richer? Well, in a new book out this coming week titled The Chickenshit Club by veteran financial reporter Jesse Eisinger (highlighted by the Huffington Post…hardly a bastion of conservative news) Eisinger details the cowardice and/or sheer incompetence of the Obama Justice Department to go after the real abuses by corporate America following the 2008 meltdown. Its the ultimate redistribution of wealth…Obama style. Read the full article here:

 

How To Stop The Russians

The Russians hacked the DNC. They also played the Trump campaign. What is going on here is beyond obvious. Yet our partisanship is blinding us to the Russian infiltration of our political process. This is exactly what the Russians want.

The Russians want internal fighting. They are fomenting conflict and uncertainty. They want to foster mistrust between and among Americans. They want chaos. They are masters of disinformation. They have perfected it over decades, if not longer, within their own political system and culture. They bred out religion. They fed totalitarian techniques through fear to bring the populace under centralized governmental control. Its what they are aiming for here.

We Americans, in our lack of experience with such subversive tactics, are sheepishly and all too willingly cooperating with the Russian agenda. It is no coincidence that immigrants from formerly Communist and Socialist countries identify exactly what is happening. They know because they have been there, wherever their particular “there” was, and they made it their mission to get here! Here, to the United States. However, instead of banding together to stop this silent and subversive invasion, we are at each other’s throats, feeding the hatred and fear that emboldens and sustains the invader’s agenda.

I know many on the Left who believe that this country has been the bane of the world’s existence through efforts to manipulate, dominate and control other nations. They also believe that in so doing we have caused the death of millions, if not hundreds of millions, around the world. This is what drives them, their disdain for our apparent greed and disregard for others with different cultures, as well as our similar disregard for the planet. I also know many on the Right believe who the United States is all that is good and true in the world and that we are the most charitable nation on the planet. The home of liberty and the benefits of capitalism for the many, both here and around the world.

There is some truth in both beliefs just as there are self-serving agendas in both. These opposite perspectives are each right and are each wrong, at different times and on different issues. However, while fully acknowledging our shortcomings and mistakes, this experiment in human freedom and its resulting advances are unprecedented in human history. It should be what binds us to one another and causes us to support and defend the perpetuation of the nation…not what sets us at each other’s throats.

In our current state of rabid blindness, we are failing to see that we have never produced what our adversaries have. We have never provided the cultural and political petri dish to grow a Stalin, Lenin, Hitler, Mussolini, Fidel Castro, Marx, Mugabe, Kim Jung II, Kim II, Idi Amin, Hirohito, Brezhnev, Chiang Kia-shek, Kaiser Wilhelm, Ho Chi Min, Saddam Hussein, Czar Nicholas II or a host of others.  So, before we jump to praise the attributes and benefits of our adversaries and their forms of governance thereby committing national suicide by a thousand internal cuts, perhaps we should find more of what we Americans have in common.

Perhaps we need to stop hating our differences and understand that independence of thought is the ultimate diversity. Through the give and take of opposing ideas is how, and where, we come to find otherwise undetectable truths.

Unless we wake up now and identify real adversaries, who present a clear and present danger, we will soon be their slaves. Then, in hindsight, our petty infighting will be revealed for what it truly was, the tool and end product of evil.

Russia is within our media, our culture, our government and our institutions. North Korea is on the verge (or already capable) of delivering an EMP on the warhead of a ballistic missile that will destroy our power grid and cause the death of millions through panic, starvation and loss of emergency services.  Do you think the Chinese aren’t readying themselves for conflict?

The answer and the cure is not more hatred. It’s more understanding. Perhaps we need to reevaluate and re-prioritize what we value. Find common ground that matters. Universal healthcare or Donald Trump Jr.’s meeting calendar won’t be our top priorities in a Gulag or North Korean prison camp.

Thank You, Barack Obama

Forty three million U.S. citizens knew who Donald Trump was when they voted for him in November 2016. All of them knew he was a builder, a reality TV star, prone to gross exaggeration and an ego-maniac who needed his name on everything. They voted for him anyway. Why?

Its physics. When a pendulum swings so far in one direction it will come back with an equal force in the opposite direction. Barack Obama set the stage and guaranteed the win for Donald Trump.

The nation had just experienced eight years of a buttoned down, smooth, always controlled, gifted (on prompter) orator who had overseen a nation in social, economic and foreign policy decline…all the while playing golf and waxing eloquent on how good things were. Well, they were not good for most of the population and we knew it in our pocketbook and our gut.

The persona of Barack Obama assured that we lost our taste for appearances. We had bought the promise of hope and change because it was delivered by a slick package that looked like the ultimate American Dream come true. But looks can be deceiving. Behind the suave exterior were crippling domestic policies, disastrous foreign policies, and a stunning disconnect from the experiences most Americans were having.

When Donald Trump stepped onto the national political stage our options narrowed. He was a refreshing but dangerous change. We were so eager to be refreshed we ignored the danger. One ignores danger at one’s peril. A nation is no less at risk from such ignorance than is an individual.

As a former Democrat turned Independent, I am not unhappy with some of the policy changes being implemented by President Trump. I have great comfort in the appointment of Justice Gorsich to the Supreme Court. I do think a temporary travel ban is called for until a secure vetting process can stop what has obviously overrun Europe due to the lack of one. The more federal regulations that can be removed from around the necks of private industry, particularly small businesses, the better.

But my happiness is tempered by the fact that I find his behavior sad and troubling.

When the Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky fiasco was playing out, my daughter was beginning grade school. I remember having to monitor what I listened to on the car radio for fear that she would be exposed to yet another conversation about the President and oral (or other variations on) sex. At that time, and ever since, my thoughts on the matter have been that regardless of whatever good Clinton may have done for the economy or foreign policy, they were far outweighed by his total lack of respect for the Office of the Presidency and the pit of smut and filth into which he had dragged the culture.

We are at such a moment.

While many are upset that this President lies, I am not. They all lie. I wish they did not, but they do. The fact that this President does it with impunity without regard for illusion is, one could argue, more honest than trying to make the lies seem true…which is what Presidents routinely do.

What I find dangerous is that President Trump is modeling behavior that makes it acceptable to get even. It is behavior most commonly found on grammar school play grounds or in college fraternity houses. It is low level consciousness behavior. It is the path of force taken by someone who lacks an understanding of power vs. force.

True power brings restraint. It is the knowledge that non-action can be the most effective use of energy. It is Martin Luther King’s approach to hatred and bigotry vs Malcolm X’s. True power minimizes the need for reactive behavior. It chooses its moment to respond with discernment and is not provoked by foolishness into premature and futile acts.

I do not know if President Trump is employing some sort of deliberate strategy by being in a battle with the press (and others). Even if it’s conscious, deliberate and helpful to him in 2020…it is harmful to the forty three million Americans who voted for him and for the millions who did not. It is bad for the nation.

This vindictive behavior adds fuel to an already blazing fire of division that has engulfed the country. It legitimizes petty and harmful acts to our youth who look for leaders and role models to emulate. It is caveman behavior lacking reason and higher ground, problem solving processes. It is beneath the office that our President serves but it is also beneath the most modest levels of civility. Mr. President, let them implode while you rise to the position with which we entrusted you.

No one should be precluded from self-defense. But when you are a graduate of the most respected business school in the nation, a self-made million or billionaire, the most powerful man in the world, surrounded 24/7 by the most elite protection force in the world, with the codes to nuclear war, literally, at your fingertips… yet you cannot seem to remember that “sticks and stones may break my bones but names will never hurt me”…then perhaps someone else should be carrying that suitcase with the codes.

Carole contact@carolegold.com

These Truths Are Self Evident

In Catholicism we believe in certain truths. These truths define our faith.

In fact, at every mass we recite The Apostle’s Creed  which lays out the tenants of our faith: “I believe in God, the Father Almighty…” Each time we go to mass we reaffirm this belief. Given what we know today by way of breakthroughs in technology and science, many critics scoff at this creed finding that it refers to a time when life was more simple. It is therefore ironic that while many Liberals and Progressives mock the Church for its stands and its creeds, the Left has its own creed. It’s just packaged differently. This whole notion of creeds came to my attention when a friend of mine blasted this out to all of his email contacts:

  1. If you believe that tax cuts for the rich benefit the poor or middle class, please de-friend me.
  2. If you have less than $15 million in net worth and still call the estate tax the “death tax”, please de-friend me.
  3. If you don’t believe the earth is warming due to greenhouse gases, please de-friend me.
  4. If you believe everyone in the USA should have health insurance, please de-friend me.

It was a fairly aggressive stance.  He was saying that if you don’t believe what I believe then we should no longer be friends. Imagine if a Catholic lay person sent this out to his friends! I can hardly imagine the scope of rebuke and criticism.

You see this list that my friend sent out is part of the “Leftist Creed.”  The difference in creeds is that the Catholic one is inspired by God and deals with the relevancy of God presence in our lives; the Left’s creed is created by man as the foundation and pillar of government as its basis and support system.

For Catholics, the creed is a statement of faith, hope and our undying faith in Christ. Something greater than us. For the Left, faith and hope are placed in the bureaucracy of government: the belief that government is good and has the power to alleviate suffering.

I harbor no allusions regarding government. I detest and loath it. I am an American with strong Latino roots. Latinos know all too well from experience how corrupt politicians are. Just look at Venezuela, Ecuador and Cuba. This distrust of all things related to politics is quite common in Latin America. Less so here in the states. Barack Obama and FDR are two politicians who come to mind, both of who governed and believed that the power of the State could solve all of society’s ills.

Given my friend’s myopic belief in the Leftist Creed, he is willing to forgo friendships over it.  I wanted to address his points, if not with him directly then here.

  •  Taxes: The State and the establishment (teachers, media, etc.) always take the high ground, arguing over the moral correctness of paying taxes. They habitually sight the worst case alternatives when arguing for higher taxes. The homeless mother who would live on the streets if not for government housing; the lunch program for children who would otherwise starve. By claiming the high ground, all others who don’t pay their fair share are labeled as “cheats” and “tax evaders.” For me, taxes are government sanctioned theft. The State is claiming a right to your wages simply because you live here. Theft is to take someone’s property against his will, i.e., by force or fraud. If I don’t pay my taxes, I will end up in jail. How is that any different than being robbed by a mugger who will harm or kill me if I don’t turn over my wallet? In the first case, the Left argues my funds are being used to take care of the poor; but, how is that different than the robber who will using my funds for the same thing? The Left claims the high ground to coerce and manipulate people out of their money. It uses these arguments by saying government will allocate and distribute the money more efficiently and equitably than private institutions. In the end , all taxes do is fund government jobs and grows the State assuring the need for yet more taxpayer money.
  • Global Warming: There is this blatantly repeated mantra that the science on global warming is “settled.” When is anything in science settled? Consider these once settled items: the earth is flat, the planets revolve around earth and earth is the center of the universe. Remember, the question for the Left is not so much whether there is any warming but whether human activity is the major contributing factor to such warming. The fact is human beings do have an effect on the planet. And, yes we have done terrible things to it including the annihilation of numerous species. I would argue humans do have a big effect on climate change given all of our industrial production; but, so could a myriad of natural phenomena such as weather, solar flares, hurricanes, and/or earthquakes. There are other factors with greater magnitude and historically documented impact than what we humans can do. The threat of global warming/climate change disaster is about fear, manipulation and profit…all being used by the political class to collect more taxes and power to support their one-world, Socialist agenda.
  • Health Insurance:  I don’t think anything owes anybody anything. I can’t outsource my health. Its my personal responsibility to be mindful of  what I eat and maintain my body so that I don’t get sick. We have been conditioned and trained to run to doctors to cure us when, in reality, they should be in place to support disease prevention, not as station of last resort. For example, car insurance works because it supports the right behavior. If I need new tires or an oil change, I pay for it myself with many companies competing for my business. But if I get into an accident or cause major damage, I use my car insurance. Similarly, I would gladly pay for catastrophic health insurance that would only cover emergencies such as cancer; but, that option is not available here in the U.S.  Inexplicably, the Left was ecstatic over the passage of universal healthcare under Obama. They knew veterans have been covered by that plan for years and the V.A. is widely recognized as an total failure and abomination.  Had healthcare been allowed to evolve under free market principles, medical costs would have collapsed the same way the cost of televisions have collapsed as quality improving exponentially over time.

We all need basic principles and values to provide a framework for living our best lives. This is what a creed does. So, you can choose between a creed, such as the one I follow, that assures me of my inherent divinity as a child of God and worth His benevolent guiding hand or you can choose the Leftist Creed that assures you that without government intervention you are doomed to poverty and destruction of the planet.

Free Will. You choose.

 

Steve

sleeclark@gmail.com