Movie Review: The Big Short

What happens when you see a movie and it only tells you half of the story?


The movie is “The Big Short.” I left the theater profoundly disturbed because as compelling as it was, the script never examines the root cause of the tragedy.

The movie is based on the book by the same name, and is about the levels of corruption and stupidity in the housing market that caused the world-crippling financial crisis of 2008. The movie is funny, fascinating, depressing and really well done.  At its core, its about greed and the lengths people will go to make money.

The story follows different fund managers who stumble upon the great cracks forming in the housing market. The managers uncover layers and layers of corruption, stupidity and outright fraud that infected the housing market from top to bottom and the financing behind it. These managers set out to profit from the fraud by making outright bets that the housing market will collapse along with the banks that funded it.

The material is admittedly complicated. It attempts to delve into many arcane parts of the financial markets by the technique of brief “out talks” by celebrities.  The script does a fantastic job of explaining what happened and making it all comprehensible to the average viewer. However after watching the movie, you leave with only a partial (small, really)  understanding of the level of fraud that actually occurred. At its core, the movie leaves out the genesis of the crisis.

I know. I was there.

The movie, the narrative and popular wisdom all have the same back story: Wall Street and its greedy bankers caused the crisis. Politicians and the government came together in a crisis and fixed the flaws in the system so that this will never happen again. But contrary to that narrative and popular belief, it was the government and its edicts that were the prime reason why we had a housing crisis in the first place.

“The Big Short” should have started with The Community Reinvestment Act, a law passed in 1977.  The law was created as a way to force banks to make more loans to the communities in which they did business. Many activists believed that banks cordoned off certain areas informally designated as “no loan zones” where they would not make loans because of the income levels and skin color of the prospective borrowers. The law was meant to these force banks to make loans in the areas in which they had a branch. So, if a bank had a branch in a poor area,the bank had to make a certain percentage of loans in that same area. Even if the bank knew there was a high probability  of default, the bank was still obligated to make the loan.

The real story, and the bigger crime, is that once activists realized they could make money off this law, they started targeting banks to force them to pay them off.  For example, an investment in Acorn or Jesse Jackson’s Rainbow Coalition could be written off by the bank as an investment in the minority community. Even Barack Obama got into the act by helping a client sue Citibank for turning her down for a loan for which she had applied.

But that wasn’t enough.

In the old days bank, banks who made the mortgages kept them on their books and recorded them as losses; but, when Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac got involved, at the urging of Congress, the housing market began to sky rocket. Once the banks realized that they could resell these problematic mortgages to government sponsored entities, they did so with vigor.  Once the banks knew they were not on the hook for the bad mortgages, and could actually make money reselling them, they did the most logical thing: they made a lot more bad loans. Between 1998 and 2003, Fannie Mae’s loan book in subprime mortgages went from $1.2 billion to $81 billion.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were, and are, Government Sponsored Entities (G.S.E). As such, they carry an implicit guarantee by the U.S. government. Thus they enjoy the same credit rating of the U.S government. Because of this fact, these two G.S.E.’s were able to package these loans and sell them to unsuspecting investors all over the world who wanted the safety and yields that their bonds offered. These investors had no idea that the loan pools they were investing in were loaded with toxic debt.

Without passage of The Community Reinvestment Act or the participation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the housing crisis would never have happened. Investors all over the world only flocked to these G.S.E  bonds because they they were allegedly vetted and guaranteed by the U.S government.

The heart of the housing crisis is really the story of how radical activists and liberal politicians hijacked the U.S financial system to advance and promote their socialist agenda. While the the activists may have hoped to to do good by giving certain people a leg up and thereby enabling them to own a house these programs actually bankrupted the poorest members of society. The ones with so little to lose lost the most.

These “do-gooders” are not done.

The Student Loan Bubble (college degrees for all!) and the Green Technology movement can trace their roots to the same housing activists. They continue to believe that government action combined with capital can create the utopia to which they so desperately aspire. The activists were not content that some students did, in fact, have access to college degrees. They set their goal to be federalizing the student loan market. The result? 1) Recent graduates are burdened with debt they can likely never repay and, 2) they are over qualified for jobs that do not exist. In the green technology movement, federal tax laws and environmental activists are working together to browbeat energy companies and the automotive industry using the power of the state to compel carbon trading platforms along with the forced development of green technologies that at this point… are not profitable .

“The Big Short” is no longer in theaters. But don’t worry… you will soon be able to see the sequels: “The Student Loan Catastrophe” and “The Green Technology Implosion.”




The Devil Is in the Details

“We need to pass the bill to see what’s in the bill.” Nancy Pelosi lobbying members of Congress why we needed to pass ObamaCare.

“You can read the Obama Trade bill after we pass it.” Paul Ryan commenting to the press on why they have not seen the details of the bill.

imagesCA27GPLZWe are all stressed. We all have too much to do. Life is so complicated that we don’t even have time to do the basics of our jobs….like Congressional Representatives actually reading the bills they plan to pass.

I get it. I used to sell new issues to my clients without reading the prospectus. (a prospectus is the document that governs the new issue).  In reality, nobody reads them and anybody who works on Wall Street will tell you that nobody reads them. I used to be  a salesperson at a bank and relied on the capital markets team to make sure that our governmental compliance was correct and accurate.

However, just as there is reason for Congress to read bills before they make them law, there is reason for traders and investors to read a prospectus before issuing or investing: there is money to be made by reading a prospectus.

Whenever a company issues a stock or a bond, a “prospectus” is attached that explains everything about the issue. These documents are thick with tiny print, boring, dull and obtuse. No one bothers to pore over the detail in them.  That is, until a deal goes bad. Then the prospectus become required reading for the professional speculator. When I worked on a trading desk, I would often have to price three deals per week. Doing a new deal is time consuming and entails the following actions:

  • Going on road shows;
  • Doing conference calls;
  • Talking to the different analysts;
  • Talking to portfolio managers;
  • Calling clients;
  • Looking at the financials;
  • Coordinating with the syndicate desk;
  • Pricing and trading the deal.

Its a lot of work and the whole structure of the deal is encapsulated in the prospectus.

The capital markets team, which brought the deals together, would be responsible for negotiating the terms and getting the legal documents together to build the prospectus. Given that the capital markets team was also overworked and pitching tons of deals, they would often use standard documentation forms from prior transactions to get the prospectus done. Think of a high-end “cut and paste” job.

If the deals were from the U.S that approach might present less of a problem. However, I worked in emerging markets where bonds were issued by different countries, in different languages, with different governing laws and an assortment of legal jurisdictions that governed the deal.

As long as the company paid its interest and principal no one would read the prospectus. But if the company fell in arrears, the first call we would get would be from the owners of the bonds requesting a copy of the prospectus. Suddenly, the fund managers, lawyers and traders found time to look at the intricate details of the issue they owned. They did so as a matter of protection.

Once a company was behind in its payments, vulture funds would circle around to see how they could pick at the carcass. Vulture funds were always looking at ways to buy assets on the cheap. For example, a typical prospectus might contain a clause stating that all the assets had to be sold to pay off all their bondholders. If the bonds were trading at 20 cents on the dollar, and the company could be liquidated for 30 cents on the dollar, a vulture fund might buy as many bonds as they could to make a quick profit.

To give you an idea as to what type of person and mindset you need to read prospectuses, take a look at a great book by Michael Lewis called “The Big Short.Lewis goes into great detail about how Michael Burry, an ex-neurologist with Aspergers Syndrome, would pour over the prospectus of arcane real estate structures. He locked himself in a room for hours on end for six months to understand what these issues were about. Only by doing so was he able to fully understand how these deals worked.

After reading the prospectus, he formed a fund and sold short many of the real estate instruments that were being issued by Wall Street banks. Many of his colleagues, peers and the bank themselves, thought he was crazy. The irony was that he had read the prospectus in its totality and knew more about the instruments than the banks that were issuing them!  The end result? Burry made millions of dollars.

He knew that the business of the banks is more transactional in nature and more orientated towards generating commissions. The salespeople were overwhelmed by the amount of deals they were doing and did not have the time to look at the minutia of the deals. Part of the reason that many salespeople did not understand the products is because the financial instruments were never fully explained to the professionals who sold them.

How does this happen?

Money is made in the financial markets by possessing knowledge that others don’t have. Even employees at the same firms will withhold information from each other. To the extent one trader can make more money than another trader, he will do so knowing that his take home pay will be greater. Because of this, employees at the same firm are not keen to share their trade secrets with their co-workers.

I have been in meetings where a firm would try to sell massive issues yet only give the barest minimum of information. Never were any of the intricacies of the deal  offered up. The presentation would be filled with acronyms and code language that made it virtually impossible for anyone to decipher.  If anyone asked a question, often times that person would be ridiculed for being stupid and not understanding what had just been explained and “clearly” understood by everybody else in the room.

Maybe that is why, in the end, all of the banks went under. They had no idea what they were selling. If the banks knew what they were selling, people like Michael Burry could not have made his millions.

Which gets me back to the quotes from Nancy Pelosi and Paul Ryan. Congress passes bills into law without even reading them. This is no different than what happened, and still happens, on Wall Street. It was only through one thoughtful man taking the time to actually do the research that was there for all to see that caused change to come to Wall Street.

If we don’t start taking the time to read the bills we’re passing, it won’t be a bank that goes under. It will be the whole country.